It’s been a funny old couple of months for Chelsea fans. A rich vein of form brought top of the league elation by the beginning of December, but turgid performances over the next few weeks saw new anxiety set in. January brought both the African Cup of Nations and some emphatic victories, but reviving fortunes were punctured by a dismal showing at Hull. In the very next game came a professional performance and a two nil win over Wenger’s Arsenal.
The top Premier League sides have been dropping more points and conceding more goals than in previous seasons, and it’s been a roller coaster ride. On the surface, however, it’s not looking bad for Chelsea who can boast a 72% win record under Ancelotti (Mourinho managed 71% in his three years), twenty clean sheets and having only failed to score once. What better time, then, for bridgeviews.co.uk’s monthly look back over the stats to look at what they can tell us about Chelsea’s progress?
Goals galore: and four players are getting all of them
In contrast to recent years, Chelsea have been prolific in front of goal this season, scoring 85 goals in total. Most have come at home, where the Stamford Bridge faithful have already celebrated 56 goals.
It’s in the league that the improvement in front of goal under Ancelotti is most marked. We are now two thirds (66%) of the way through the Premier League season and, having scored 60 goals, Chelsea are already 88% of the way towards matching the total number of goals scored last season, and 83% of the way to matching the club’s Premier League record (72). Scoring at rate of 2.4 goals per game, Chelsea are on target to score 92 over the course of the season, just five less than Man Utd’s current record of 97.
Perhaps even more surprising is that Chelsea are keeping up with their normally more attacking counterparts this season, having scored just one less than Man Utd and the same number as Arsenal. And they said our attack was ageing...
Looking at the goals that have been scored however, it’s clear that the vast majority are being scored or created by four players: Drogba, Lampard, Anelka and Malouda. Between them they have scored 53 goals – 62% of all Chelsea’s goals – and made 31 assists. Drogba’s worth is clear for all to see, contributing (by way of scoring or providing an assist) a goal every 0.8 games, but Malouda’s effectiveness is perhaps more surprising. He’s made far less appearances than Drogba and Lampard (just 19, many from the subs bench) and has contributed a goal every 1.2 games. Lampard’s record stands at having contributed a goal every 1.3 games.
But a leaky defence is costing points
On the face of it, 20 clean sheets – that’s one in 56% of all the games Chelsea have played this season – looks a very good record.
If Chelsea don’t pick up any silverware this season however it will be because the defence is not what it once was. Petr Cech has been beaten 20 times in the league already this season – just four less than were conceded in all of last season combined. The club is comfortably on course for its worst defensive record in the league for five years, when 30 goals were conceded in 03/04.
A goal down? Chelsea probably won’t come back
Over the last five years Chelsea have earned a reputation for composure, resilience and mental toughness. But the stats suggest something a little different this season. In all of Chelsea’s 36 games so far this season, Ancelotti’s men have conceded the first goal 11 times (that’s nearly one in every three games). And in those games Chelsea have only come back to win four times, drawing six of them.
That might not seem so bad, but consider those stats in the face of Chelsea’s record against the so-called ‘big four’, which reads four games played, four wins, eight for zero against. Those eleven teams who have scored against Chelsea first aren’t typically the league’s best clubs, but mid to lower table opposition. The reason Chelsea aren’t further ahead of Man Utd is because of a worse than normal record against lower table opposition, and too many draws having conceded an early goal – the West Ham game being a case in point.
Playing away isn’t so easy
And no, I’m not referring to John Terry’s private life. Chelsea’s record at home – in contrast to last season – has been astonishing under Ancelotti, with 89% of all games played at Stamford Bridge ending in Chelsea victory. Chelsea have won 92% of all home league games, racking up an average of 2.9 points per game.
Away from the safety of SW6 however there is a very different picture. Chelsea have won just 50% of all away games in the league, and scored just 1.8 points per game in the process. Across all competitions, they have scored half as many goals away (21 compared to 39 at the Bridge) and concede more, too (12 compared with 8). Only a third of Chelsea’s clean sheets have come on their travels.
Many of the stats above can be rationalised – you can understand why they’re working out that way. Many, for example, have speculated that Drogba’s increased return is down to him being more consistently partnered with Anelka or Ancelotti understanding how to ‘man manage’ him. But the difference between home and away performance – such a dramatic change on last season’s form – is more difficult to explain. I’ll be posting on this later in the week. In the meantime, if you have any ideas why Chelsea’s luck is drying up away from home, please post a comment.
You might also be interested to read:
- How the stats looked in January: prolific scorers and losing form
- How the stats looked in December: all or nothing football and the trouble with playing away
If you don't mind, can you start an article in the build up to Chelsea vs Inter, just to see how our stats against their's is, and the effect players like Milito, Sneider and Pandev are having. I think we need to change the diamond away from home, because sometimes we are predictable. And I so agree that our record against lower opposition is not good, even against Portsmouth we struggled while the rest put in 5 goals a game! Great article though!
Posted by: Shay Thpr | 09 February 2010 at 13:21
It's that damn away shirt I tell you..
Most stats are interesting but I'm not so sure about Carlos 72% win record,let's wait till the CL games to have a better picture.I'm afraid that our away form is going to cost us the league,50% is just unacceptable for a top team.
Posted by: Kostaz | 09 February 2010 at 13:51
Shay - welcome to the blog. Thanks for your comment, an interesting idea. I'm no expert on Italian football, but will give it some thought.
Kostaz - you're right re. the 72%. Yes, it's good so far, but let's compare it to Mourinho's 71% once Ancelotti's been here three years.
I'm very nervous about the Premier League - have a feeling United will win it. As you say we're just not good enough on our travels.
Oh and Kostaz - thanks for your comment too. Incidentally it's the 600th comment ever made on this blog!
Posted by: bridgeviews.co.uk | 09 February 2010 at 14:05
ya away form is so poor for a champion team..,
Lets start better away record from tomorrow at goodison
LAst few seasons picked a lots of points from us..,shud not allow this time as they are the only team who are not beaten at the bridge this season in the league..
Posted by: zaneeblue | 09 February 2010 at 16:28
Its really amazing to see Malouda up there,
there are lots of chelsea fans who are not happy with him.., the man has stats to speak...
Speaking about stats.., manutd'd second topscorer is OG!!!!
Posted by: zaneeblue | 09 February 2010 at 16:31
interesting stuff. like zaneeblue, can't believe malouda's up there. he was great with hiddinck but i reckon he's been pretty weak this season
Posted by: chelsfan | 09 February 2010 at 16:44
Hey i'm also a very nervous Chelsea fan but i really think we'll win the league. Man U performances are really deceptive. They seem to enjoy playing weak and naive teams but will ome unstuck against most top half teams.
Posted by: Ortiv | 09 February 2010 at 20:23
Hello! I am the manager of http://chelseafcazul.blogspot.com/ and my name is Daniela Morrongiello. I am interested in proposing a link exchange with your website (http://www.bridgeviews.co.uk/) related to Chelsea FC. The link to your website will appear in the associated part of my blog.
If you wish you can send an image (160x20 pix) for the button. Or if you prefer, send a picture for me to do and then added to the list of wbes.
Thanks for the attention!
E-Mail: [email protected]
Daniela M - Chelsea FC Azul (Admin.)
Posted by: Daniela M | 10 February 2010 at 03:51
The reason we lose away seems fairly obvious to me. When we do go behind Ancelotti takes far to long to make a change when go behind. There is always a good 20 minute period we lose the initiative and he will wait until the 75th or even 80th to change anything. Guus in contrast would throw on some new players when the game was going against us. We did the same thing against Arsenal, when we where really crying out for some kind of attacking outlet and fresh legs.
Posted by: J. Spencer | 10 February 2010 at 09:58
They dont play well thats all.its not luck they lack.they cant even pass the ball let alone control the game and attack.they are just aweful away.
and yes, ancelotti takes too long to make changes when we are down, unlike Guus did.he changed the tactics more quickly in the game as well and we got results
Posted by: Laurel | 10 February 2010 at 11:03
Thanks for everyone's comments!
J. Spencer and Laurel - I think you're bang on re. Ancelotti. It's probably only on substitutions that I've been disappointed with him thus far - I've written about it a few times. I've started some analysis of all his substitutions actually, so watch this space for an article specifically devoted to that.
Perhaps there's something in the diamond not being as destructive away from home too?
Posted by: bridgeviews.co.uk | 10 February 2010 at 12:11
I remember your post about late subs but then again the one time he made subs early was against Blackburn and we all know what happened there.
Posted by: Kostaz | 10 February 2010 at 13:12
@Kostaz. I believe the game against blackburn was when we had a player injured and had to play with 10 men after using our subs? Ever since then it's seemed as though he has been a little slower to use substitutions. I'm not asking for 3 subs, just a fresh pair of legs when we are getting pinned in our area. Today he brought on Kalou a little earlier...I honestly would have preferred Sturridge to come on before, though every time time I write off Kalou he scores.
@bridgeviews.
I'd actually look forward to that analysis, it would be interesting. I do think the diamond in part was a cause, it was figured out pretty quickly that you just had to get narrow and we had no Kaka to open things up. Joe Cole also didn't step up into his "preferred" position to fill that role. However, we seem to have dropped it now in favor of the 4-3-3 so it shouldn't really be an issue.
Posted by: J. Spencer | 10 February 2010 at 22:23
i am too with that same opinion...he subs are too late.., they r not geting the time they wants to mahke an impact..
what happened to Joe?
he used to play well against everton....
Posted by: Zaneeb Sayed | 11 February 2010 at 10:16
wha a horrible results.. r defences is playin like a italian defences.. its not good enough for the premiership ... we show it wednesday and we showed it today .. the first goal tevez scored is a main let down to us... we need essien back soon as possible..time to have a serious think about mourinho .. the way inter played was jus like the way we played under him..
Posted by: cfc kiddo | 27 February 2010 at 15:39
Here's a question for all Chelsea fans - should England fans boo John Terry?
Full article here:
http://www.football-intelligence.co.uk/2010/03/02/should-the-england-fans-boo-john-terry/
Posted by: FootballIntel | 02 March 2010 at 18:14